News RSS Feed


Win an iPod

Shock wind plans

9:04am Thursday 27th July 2006

comment Comments (4)   Have your say »


THE Quantock Hills, Sedgemoor battle site, Bridgwater, Woolavington, Chilton Polden and the Huntspill Levels these are all sites earmarked for wind farms under a new scheme from Somerset County Council.

One week after the Government's new energy review offered encouragement to firms hoping to build wind farms at Brent Knoll and Hinkley, a council report has shown that could be just the tip of the iceberg.

"I am truly horrified that sites like The Quantocks - an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty - are being considered."

Bridgwater MP Ian Liddell-Grainger

The authority is now investigating putting turbines across farmland it owns around the county, and has already drawn up a list of potential sites including those in the six areas listed above.

If the authority gives the idea a formal go-ahead at its executive meeting tomorrow (Wednesday), detailed studies will be compiled to pinpoint the most suitable sites.

These studies will take into account factors like wind speed, distance from housing, access and proximity to the National Grid, as well as public opinion.

Once the turbine destinations are prioritised, planning applications will be submitted. If all goes according to plan, the turbines will be built, and the county council will be earn a subsidy from the operating firms.

The proposals have not been greeted with open arms in all quarters, with Bridgwater's Tory MP Ian Liddell-Grainger among the first to speak out in opposition.

He said: "I am truly horrified that sites like The Quantocks an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty are being considered.

Either I'm going mad, or somebody else is.

"This is all around the countryside, right through the middle of the levels and by the battlefield site. I am simply appalled.

This is a horrific idea, totally absurd."

But Cllr Paul Buchanan, the county's executive member for economic development, insisted careful consideration would be given to choosing the right sites, but insisted the authority was dutybound to act to help reduce global warming.

He said: "The council must take action to reduce the effects of climate change resulting from the burning of fossil fuels, and in order to do this we must support the development of secure and sustainable supplies of energy.

"The most common renewable energy available in Somerset is wind energy.

However, alongside supporting the installation of wind turbines, the county council is committed to ensuring that any potential adverse impacts are minimised through careful site selection and extensive public consultation."

And the county was backed by Matthew Spencer, chief executive of environmental group Regen SW, who said he believed the public will support the proposal.

He said: "Wind turbines remain one of the most effective ways of generating green energy and tackling climate change, so it makes sense for the council to explore the options for putting turbines on its own land.

"While wind energy proposals always generate some opposition, I suspect that with good siting and a good consultation, the council will get the majority of the public behind this important project."


Your Say YourBridgwater Mercury

Jonathan Lincoln, says...
1:20am Thu 27 Jul 06

Embrace the renewables revolution.
Wind farms rock !
Jonathan

Terry, says...
2:40am Thu 27 Jul 06

I'd much rather see and hear wind turbines than be near a nuclear power station.

People should realize that although nuclear power is silent it causes waste that lasts for hundreds of years.

After reading the reports of building a sluice or barrage across the river Parrett the powers that be should consider using that as a way of generating electricity as well.

Mr K S Glynn, Bridgwater says...
9:53am Sun 11 Nov 07

Does anyone who is assosiated with the decissions, of where these wind turbines are sited, have any sence? I am looking for a new career, but with only one cse, it seems I am way to clever to apply for a job in local government!!!! How dare these stupid idiots even mention the Sedgemoor Battlefield and the Quantocks as proposed sites for wind turbines! Whilst I am in favour of this form of 'green' energy, surely common sence dictates that the sites are sensibly situated. What is wrong with siting these turbines along the coast and around the land where Hinkley Point power station already is? There is no closer proximity to the national grid, and for what it is worth the area has already been blighted with a monstrosity of a building in the power station itself. For the sake of common sence will at least one of the muppets in the local authority read this and see some sence PLEASE !!!!!

Graham Jones, Bridgwater says...
10:40am Wed 14 May 08

Firstly, does anyone trust any politician, of any hue or level, to be trustworthy or intelligent enough to make a decision on anything? Specifically, our environment; visual, economic or any/all aspects when it is threatened by miss-informed opinions such as the blind commitment to the ‘official’ (as force fed from Brussels) line on global warming. There is a very creditable alternative to this narrow, unproven opinion on the cause of global warming (as, for instance, convincingly explained in Channels 4’s “The Global Warming Swindle”). These unemployables (politicians) who have greased there way into positions of undue influence, are currently secretly in consultation with those (and the only ones) who will profit from wind farms (the construction industry) as I witnessed only yesterday, by catching sight of a ‘Commercial in Confidence’ sighting paper for a 400ft monstrosity on the hill adjacent to M5’s Junction 23. Open politics! Where’s the vote catching/personal income protection/power maintenance in that???

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »